Canal rejected
Colin Barnett’s canal proposal, discussed several times here has been rejected. More on this at the RSMG blog.
"I do not know how he is a professor, but anyway he purports to be an economist" Senator Richard Alston, ex-Minister for Communications
"One of the elder statesmen of the Oz blogosphere" - Age Media Blog
"More intelligent than Britney Spears"Jason Soon
"The great neo-classical iconoclast"Ross Gittins
"A green activist with a totalitarian mindset", editorial, The Australian
"would argue under a pile of wet statistics and produces more copy than Xerox". Stephen Matchett in the Australian
"the odd Quiggan (sic) is good mental exercise; all part of life's rich tapestry et al."Peter Jonson
"Wrong", "incorrect", "off the mark again" Institute for Public Affairs, Institute for Private Enterprise, Centre for Independent Studies etc.
"Never wrong"Tim Blair
"A compassionate exponent of the dismal science" Stewart Fist
"An indispensable weblog"Bear Left
"Quiggin strikes me as the stereotype of an Australian - joyful, hearty, and not particularly aware of his own strength."SomeCallMeTim
"Krugman of the Antipodes"Christopher Joye
" ... his chief delight was drinking cups of coffee at odd hours" Anthony Powell A Dance to the Music of Time
I think this whole debacle shows how little most non economists (which is almost all the general public) understand about opportunity cost.
The fact that so many sandgropers were in favour of this idea before costs had been estimated or alternatives considered is staggering.
I was sure that if you sat these people down and said:
“If and when it is considered we will need to increase our freshwater supplies, it would be best for everyone if we achieved this at the least possible cost”
they would understand. Am I living in a fantasyland – I dont know anymore.
At least there was SOMEWHAT more sophistication in the argument that there would be spin-off externalities for Aboriginies in the proposal, but again, dont people understand that you could generate freshwater for far less then spend the difference on improving Aboriginal welfare, and we would all still be better off?
I am still shaking my head
Chris,
This was a political decision, not an economic one. Colin was trying to demonstrate that he was capable of making decisions, in contrast to “Good News” Geoff, who only seemed to put in an appearence once it was established that a decision had been well received. If it was a bad one the relevant minister would take the blame.
Granted, Andrew, but the fact remains that this proposal was seriously considered prior:
1) to any discussion of its cost; and
2) without any consideration of lower-cost alternatives