Home > Regular Features > Monday Message Board

Monday Message Board

May 31st, 2010

It’s time, once again for the Monday Message Board. Post comments on any topic. As usual, civilised discussion and no coarse language.

Categories: Regular Features Tags:
  1. May 31st, 2010 at 20:46 | #1

    John, any topic? O.K. Just out of interest I looked up how many full-time electrician jobs were advertised for Queensland today on seek.com, and plotted them by sector, with a view to asking whther mining might just be distorting the economy. Results here:


  2. Freelander
    June 1st, 2010 at 00:15 | #2

    @Charles Worringham

    Yes. Good chart. Serious policy though needs to be given to the costs that mining, due to the volatility of commodity prices, inflicts on the rest of the economy. At the moment, this cost is ignored. And we even have the ignoratti claiming that “mining saved us from the global financial crisis”, when as Ken Henry pointed out, if the rest of the economy went the way of mining unemployment would have shot up to 19 per cent. The current housing shortage and housing price boom which may eventually lead to a collapse, are all thanks to mining. If we let the mining lobby have the resources for almost nothing then we have nothing to show for mining’s impact on the rest of the economy.

  3. June 1st, 2010 at 00:22 | #3


    Art Robinson Wins the Republican Congressional Nomination in Oregon District 4

    Republican voters of Oregon District 4 have chosen Dr. Art Robinson to represent them in the November 2010 Congressional race against Democrat Peter DeFazio. With 70% of votes counted as of 8:54 pm, Art currently has 80% of the total.


    Art is an expert on energy and widely known for his petition signed by more than 31,000 American scientists exposing human-caused global warming as a fraud. He worked on medical and defense issues during the Reagan Administration and energy issues during Clinton and Bush.

  4. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 1st, 2010 at 00:59 | #4

    Update, Update, Update, according to the lastest reports Tony Abbott is now offside with the Catholic Church teachings for according to Bishop Joe Grech “It has always been the view of the Catholic Church that human beings such as asylum seekers should be treated as human beings, not as political footballs”. Furthermore, many would agree with the Edmund Rice Centre in condemning the Coalition’s newly-announced asylum seeker policy as being ‘fundamentally flawed’ and ‘cruel’. Thumbs up ‘Your Excellency’.

  5. Freelander
    June 1st, 2010 at 01:39 | #5

    But is this the church’s teachings according to the Pelliban?

  6. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 1st, 2010 at 07:53 | #6

    Freelander, in respect to the newly-announced asylum seeker policy, Tony Abbott & the rabble within the Shadow Cabinet are out of step with the Catholic Church’s position which is in tune with those on the left.

  7. billie
    June 1st, 2010 at 07:54 | #7

    At the Rio Tinto AGM, Hunter Valley coal miners asked a series of questions re safety, pay, management and something like the following

    “Why does Mt Thorley hire overseas workers when there are locals who on contract who want a permanent job?”

    The first thought that springs to mind is to reduce the power of the unions. Further consideration & Worthingham’s graph leads me to ask who is training up the electrical apprentices. In the good old days apprentices were trained by government organisations like electricity, railway, Telstra and large companies like BHP. Can sub contractors take up the training slack left by large organisations reducing their employee numbers.

    So the real costs of the mining boom are that mining pays high wages to absorb all available workers and mining doesn’t train apprentices for its future needs.

  8. June 1st, 2010 at 08:49 | #8

    @Substance McGravitas
    Dear Mr/Ms/Mrs McGravitas, you neglected to put in the irony alerts. Otherwise, how can we tell you apart from the trolls?

  9. Freelander
    June 1st, 2010 at 09:00 | #9

    @Michael of Summer Hill

    There are lefty bishops in the CC (not yet excommunicated). Is young Tony out of step with Pell or the Pope?

  10. June 1st, 2010 at 10:20 | #10

    Dear Mr/Ms/Mrs McGravitas, you neglected to put in the irony alerts.

    I am a poor man and must carefully ration my supply of irony alerts.

  11. Ron
    June 1st, 2010 at 12:48 | #11

    Obama and Rudd both ar quite clearly committed Christians & said so publicly , as is Abbott , however i see no place for mixing there private religous faith with there roles responsibilities as public electd officials eg Obama on afghanistan and Mexican border refugees although some zealous athiests seek to do so

    Abbotts failure as was Howards , was not a religous issue , but a FA polisy failure to adhere to th UN 1951 Refugee Conventon we Australia were party to , yet disengenously not withdraw from that 1951 Conventon

  12. Crocodile
    June 1st, 2010 at 12:55 | #12

    Charles, perhaps the mining sector simply turn staff over at a faster rate and need to advertise more often.

  13. Freelander
    June 1st, 2010 at 16:21 | #13


    Yes. Of course, they ship in electricians from far away, send them down the mine, and then, opps, forget to bring them back out and have to go shopping for replacements. That explains it.

  14. Freelander
    June 1st, 2010 at 16:23 | #14

    Maybe mining doesn’t hire electricians at all. They just enjoy advertising for them and interviewing them.

  15. Taylor
    June 1st, 2010 at 16:53 | #15

    “The evidence of lost positive spillovers from an expansion in Australia’s minerals sector is not obvious. Mining exploration and production in Australia is highly skilled. It generates its own positive spillovers. For example, there are Australian firms that develop software for geological exploration and the modelling of mine operations. Potentially, as the world’s mineral production is pushed towards more marginal deposits that are more costly or difficult to extract, Australia’s comparative advantage in mining services will become even more valuable.
    Even if there was hard evidence of relatively greater spillovers elsewhere, the appropriate policy response might be to target such spillovers directly, as governments do with assistance for research and development.”

  16. Freelander
    June 1st, 2010 at 18:13 | #16

    There are pluses and minuses from having the mining sector and from the endowment of resources Australia currently has. The objective is to maximise the net benefits from that endowment, to maximise for the benefit of all Australians. This objective would lead to different policies than those which might maximise the benefits flowing to some sub-sector of Australians. In part, this is what the clash between the government and the mining lobby is about. The mining lobby is quite clear about what is best for them. And the are quite happy to tell any lies that might help them achieve that end. Let’s hope the government can convince the voting public that this proposed tax is better for them than the outcome that lobby is after.
    The mining sector does impose costs on other sectors of the economy because of volatility both in terms of the prices and volumes of resources demanded. How best to ameliorate these impacts, in the interests of all Australians, requires serious thought. The levels of demand for those with the skills needed for the sector is something that probably doesn’t require long term policy as this is the type of problem that tends to solve itself, eventually. But volatility sourced in the sector, in the demands for all sorts of resources used, is a different matter. The volatility from the sector, also has impacts on the exchange rate and presents problems for macro policy.

  17. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 1st, 2010 at 18:30 | #17

    Freelander, you are correct about members of the Clergy siding with the left. And yes the Catholic Church does get upset when Tony Abbott goes ape on and announces inhumane and cruel policies.

  18. Freelander
    June 1st, 2010 at 18:43 | #18

    But does Cardinal George or Pope Fritz get upset?

  19. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 1st, 2010 at 19:57 | #19

    Freelander, I believe Anglican Bishop Michael Hough speaks for all Christians when he says, “The plight of all refugees should be a matter that occupies the hearts, prayers and resources of all Christians.” and a slap in the face of the Coalition’s new asylum seeker policy which can best be described as a work in regress.

  20. Freelander
    June 1st, 2010 at 20:15 | #20

    I wouldn’t think anyone speaks for all Christians.

  21. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 1st, 2010 at 20:23 | #21

    Freelander, many would disagree but you are entitled to your opinion.

  22. robert (not from UK)
    June 1st, 2010 at 20:48 | #22

    It amazes me how many persons are convinced that Tony Abbott passionately believes in Catholic teachings. He might well have done so once, but on the strength of what I have seen of his utterances in public during recent years (I don’t mean staged TV interviews etc), I’d assert that he’d spout any doctrine that he thought would get him into the Lodge.

    If he depended on the vegan vote he’d call for the banning of Kentucky Fried Chicken. If Jehovah’s Witnesses held the balance of political power he would furiously denounce blood transfusions. Put him in one of western Sydney’s Muslim-dominated electorates and he’d rain down curses on the habit of eating pork.

    This widespread notion of Abbott as some sort of theocrat is in my view nonsense. He most certainly was not agonising over Catholic doctrine’s political implications in parliament before Cardinal Pell became Australia’s best-known Catholic bishop (although his Bulletin account of seminary life suggests that he started out with genuine religious conviction).

    I am not accusing Abbott of conscious hypocrisy. I am accusing him of a desperate desire to be loved at all costs. Nobody, I am sure, was more astonished than Abbott when his “budgie smugglers” appearance was widely criticised.

  23. Freelander
    June 1st, 2010 at 21:54 | #23

    And how does this, do you think, make him differ from when he was thinking of entering the priesthood? And how, do you think, this makes him differ from the average priest, bishop or pope? Or many a ‘christian’? Often, very narcissistic types like to picture themselves as ‘saints’, as displaying moral leadership, and so on. They are not above preaching. And do as I say not as I do doesn’t come into it. They never see what they do because they have a great capacity to interpret whatever they do in a very special way. What do you think the devil was invented for? It is so ‘good’ people can do ‘bad’ things, not feel responsible for them, and still feel ‘good’ about themselves. The devil was the world’s greatest invention for facilitating evil. Bad people don’t feel they are doing good while they do bad. Only ‘good’, god fearing, people manage that.

    Haven’t you seen the typical American tele-evangelist?

  24. Ron
    June 2nd, 2010 at 00:33 | #24

    “Bad people don’t feel they are doing good while they do bad. ”

    obvious your ignoranse of criminal psychology knows no bounds

    PM’s Hawke (agnostic) and Rudd (christian) performed there PM roles irespective of there religion/non religon beliefs

    and Tony Abbott should be so judged also on his politcal efforts irespective of whatever religion if any he has whereas to use religion against Abbott is either a lame effort to attack religion OR a lame & for lazy effort to attack Tony Abbott I think tony Abbott should be given no “excuses” for his politcal views , he owns them personaly and should wear personal responsibility alone

  25. Freelander
    June 2nd, 2010 at 01:25 | #25


    I didn’t say that they didn’t feel good. I said that they don’t feel they are doing good. [Some exceptions, like Robin Hood, for example, excluded.] Thought I would clarify that as I wonder whether you know the difference. Further, obviously christians who do bad things are bad people (to the extent that labelling individuals by their actions is appropriate). They do think they are good people, part of their delusion, and frequently not only feel good while they do bad things, but justify to themselves their actions by convincing themselves they are doing good. In other cases they are ‘possessed’ by demons. As far as doing bad things go, sometimes people (christian or not) do bad things because they are not are not feeling that good themselves. There are many reasons people do bad things and there isn’t really a separate psychology of the ‘criminal’ anyway.

    Notice, the word good is being used in various ways. Use of a dictionary, for the hard of thinking, is advisable.

    In relation to your claim that religious beliefs should be ignored in a potential prime minister…

    Both GW Bush and Poodle Blair had regular direction from ‘god’ while they were ‘leading’. We learned that before and during GW’s presidency. With Blair he only confessed after he left parliament.

    If someone is unashamedly chrisitian, I have to suspect they too believe they also hear voices. Comes with the territory.

    Finally, I do not excuse Abbott his christianity.

  26. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 2nd, 2010 at 03:23 | #26

    Freelander, Abbott is a bigot for he ignores the basic teachings of Catholicism that of ‘Love (caritas)’. What Phoney Abbott is doing is unchristian for “Caritas in veritate” is the principle around which the Church’s social doctrine govern moral action. In otherwords, you cannot claim to be on the one hand a good Christian and then ignore the Church’s guiding principle of Caritas and introduce newly-announced asylum seeker policy that are ‘fundamentally flawed’ and ‘cruel’. Bloody drongo.

  27. Freelander
    June 2nd, 2010 at 09:39 | #27

    There are no ‘basic’ teachings of Christianity or Catholicism. Both are confusing mish-mashes of myths and stolen ideas from elsewhere and ideas projected into meaningless babble over two thousand years. Love is an important part of both – self love.

  28. Freelander
    June 2nd, 2010 at 09:42 | #28

    Christians can claim anything they like. That is part of the beauty and of the magic.

  29. Ernestine Gross
    June 2nd, 2010 at 10:40 | #29

    I have a question. Does anybody know whether there has been a straw poll on the reaction of people to the hike in cigarette prices in relation to the drop in public approval ratings of the government? (Fran Barlows or anybody else, please don’t give me a lecture on how wrong it is for me to ask a question on the forbidden topic. I ask this question because things don’t seem to add up as if there were a missing variable)

  30. Ron
    June 2nd, 2010 at 12:51 | #30

    Ernestine Gross

    “I have a question. Does anybody know whether there has been a straw poll on the reaction of people to the hike in cigarette prices in relation to the drop in public approval ratings of the government? ”

    yes there was I recall reading one at time of its intro , although whilst it did not ask if it wuld change there vote , but it was done “by Party” with Labor suporters most against (prob working familys least abl;e to afford it)

    This Cigarette tax rise happened about time of Assylum seekers change & CPRS deferral and all three may be linked to public already “softened up” from MSN’s long scare campaign against both th ETS allegedly costing 000’s of jobs , ETS attacked from both ‘left; (Greens) & th “right’ (Libs with disinformaton , plus MSN’s long sensationalism of th 4 Insulaton deaths implying that th Govt was directly responsible for th 4 deaths & that whole Scheme was a total death trap

    It reminds me of reading of Whitlam’s similar experience , ‘war’ against Labor , denying its legitimasy to govern , and Public can not get there “news’ from any independent sources to counter this…a la MSN’s general treatment of Israli atttack on aid flotilla

  31. Ron
    June 2nd, 2010 at 13:25 | #31

    1/ Freelander
    A/ “Bad people don’t feel they are doing good while they do bad. ”

    your later attempt to justify this bigoted coment defies pyschological expertise , and logic

    B/ “If someone is unashamedly chrisitian, I have to suspect they too believe they also hear voices. Comes with the territory.”

    Barrack Obama and Kevin Rudd will be pleased you think that of them
    I’d estimate less than 1% of population wuld share your stage view

    C/ I notice you picked on George W Bush to lamely attack religon , but disengenously not Obama

    Yet to follow your logic Obama being a firmly commited public Christan , should hav followed his own christian views and pulled out of iraq on day one , and nort increased troops to Afghansistan , and opened Mexican borders to millions of mexicans whoever wanted to come , and promised trillions and trilions in aid to th poor starving peioples of th World

    Truth is which you can not rebut is that Obama , and indeed any Western leeder will make decisions based on public polisy , national security interest and politcs considerations , irrespctive of whether they ar mainstream religous or athiest Not even UK Athiest Richard Dawkins wuld make your claims

    2/ Michael of Summer Hill
    You say Abbott lacks ‘caritas’ for his suport of an unhumane assylum agenda
    A/ What quality do th athiest Liberal MHR’s lack for also suporting that Lib unhumane assylum agenda ? and
    B/ whatever quality you think they lack , if Abbott had that quality would that change Abbot’s unhumane assylum agenda ?

  32. Ernestine Gross
    June 2nd, 2010 at 14:08 | #32

    1. F: “Bad people don’t feel they are doing good while they do bad. ”

    2. R: “your later attempt to justify this bigoted coment defies pyschological expertise , and logic”

    No, statement 1 does not defy logic. It could be said that statement 1 is an example where the said people are logical (rational) and they have rational expectations about how they are perceived by others (including psychologists) who categorise people by their actions according to their own value system. I think this was Freelander’s point.

  33. Fran Barlow
    June 2nd, 2010 at 14:09 | #33


    The only poll I have seen Ron is a poll that suggested most thought the cigarette impost was designed to divert attention away from discussuion about the dumping of the ETS.

    In general support for rises in cigarette excise has been strong, especially if the respondents are confident that the funds will go to cigarette consumption abatemwent and treatment.

  34. Ernestine Gross
    June 2nd, 2010 at 14:48 | #34

    Thanks for the feedback on cigarette excise increase. It seems to me what one would like to have is cross-sectional data on personal income, number of cigarettes smoked, number of years the person has been a smoker, voting behaviour in 2007. One can then calculate the percentage of after tax income spent on smokes and the reduction of residual income. The smokers are now in a minority, hence general support and purpose are not sufficient to deduce anything much. Until proven otherwise, I hypothesise that this policy measure is a non-trivial factor in the poll results. A 30% price increase in a personal budget item that has a, say, 15% weight matters.

  35. June 2nd, 2010 at 14:55 | #35

    The thing I found interesting is that, if I read the papers correctly, the government is not forecasting any substantial increase in revenue from that tax increase. Have we reached the peak of the Laffer curve in terms of tax revenue?

  36. Fran Barlow
    June 2nd, 2010 at 15:07 | #36

    @Andrew Reynolds

    if I read the papers correctly, the government is not forecasting any substantial increase in revenue from that tax increase.

    If that proves to be so, then the government can claim that it worked. Assuming no contraband, fewer cigarettes are being sold.

  37. June 2nd, 2010 at 17:36 | #37

    I dont know about anyone else but I feel that this is the most uninteresting period of AUS political history in living memory. Rudd makes Fraser’s promise to keep politics off the front pages seem like an invitation to a Roman orgy by comparison.

    Under Rudd we have entered the Era of Universal Boredom where most political issues are either inherently dull (federal-state responsibilities on health, gimme a break!). Or, if they offer a glimmer of hope (such as climate change), have been drained of all possible interest.

    It does not help that the most prominent ministers, such as Swan and Wong, seem to have been designed by a consortium of mid-century bank managers and insurance acturaries to lower our pulse rate to the bare minimum necessary to sustain life. Swan is relentlessly on-message, never showing a moments doubt or hesitation. Wong drones on about carbon credits, clean mechanisms, rebates…oh dear God, may the Earth swallow me up.

    Rudd himself is the quintessential master of the sleep-inducing, mind-numbing, spirit-dampening rhetorical arts. As Humphries said, its like being ruled by ones dentist. Prattling on endlessly with his inanities whilst gouging deeper into ones skull with various instruments of torture.

    Blogging through his premiership is like swimming through an ocean of rice pudding. [Feel strength waning, slipping below the surface now, only a few popping bubbles to mark one’s final resting place…] I think this explains why so many of the blogs have turned in-ward, getting bogged down in essentially sterile debates about who is really to blame for the woes of the world. Bored people tend to get cranky.

    History Ends not with a bang, but with a whimper.

  38. Ron
    June 2nd, 2010 at 17:47 | #38


    I’ve checked Morgan , Essential , AC Neilsen & Roy Morgon ,and donr believe there was any poll sugesting cigarette rise was to avoid talk on CPRS deferal You may well be thinkin of Comentariat who constantly pushed that story line

    Fact is cigarette rise was a typical pre Budget rise , make it public before being submerged by actual budget measures It was needed money wise by Govt to reduce forcast Debt , and ADDS about a billion net in income

    Good news is there is normal some reducton in smoking from rises , and given it was a huge 25% , likely more than usual drop off (but still a net $ gain to Fed Govt)

    As said , a poll did say Labor voters most against it , not surprise as it hits working familys who least able to afford and some lost votes wuld therefore arise , (although total Labor voters as with othr Partys voters by large majority suport th cigs rise)

    Ernestine Gross
    Essential point was there is NO evidense whatsoever that Barack Obama decisions (a comitted public christian) on Iraq , Afghanistan , Mexican border , trillions for overseas aid…ar affected one iota by whether he was christian or an athiest…ditto George Bush ..ditto Kevin Rudd…ditto th agnostic Bob Hawke …which makes th basis of Freelander’s anti religous claims linked to politcans polisys positions absolute nonsense

    As for th further Freelandr general claim of such publicley commited Christians “hearing voices” , which by extension includes Obama and Rudd , I’m sure 99% of people would back Obama and Rudd for inteligense and sanity VS a Freelander silly enough to make such unqualified absurd claims against Obama & Rudd

    all it is is an Athiests lame attempt to make such linkage …to attack religion
    Whereas whethr there is merit in religion itself (where 80% of oz peoples per latest poll declare they ar culturally Christian) is a diferent issue to argue

  39. June 2nd, 2010 at 17:59 | #39

    Try Galaxy …

    Rudd’s tobacco tax a smokescreen: poll

    About 53 per cent of Australians believe the prime minister’s crackdown on smoking, announced last week, was meant to shift the public’s focus after Labor shelved its ETS and abandoned the home insulation program.

    It was IPA commissioned though …

  40. Freelander
    June 2nd, 2010 at 18:07 | #40


    Non standard use of the word ‘bigot’. No quite sure what you meant. Not quite sure you know what you meant, except that ‘bigot’, to many people, has negative connotations.

  41. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 2nd, 2010 at 18:09 | #41

    Ron, until Tony Abbott comes to his senses I’m afraid the newly-announced and cruel asylum seeker policy will be his undoing for Labor is trying to seize the moral high ground after the Coalition last week signalled a return to Pacific Solution-style processing.

  42. Freelander
    June 2nd, 2010 at 18:19 | #42


    Ron, Obama is more your closet christian, which makes him so much more acceptable. And I doubt very much he will confess the way Blair did, after he relinquished the prime ministership. Obama might even be one of these people who goes to church to avoid persecution by christians. Good policy if one wishes to be US president. Hallelujah!

    You don’t really think many high up in any of the christian theocracies, honestly still believe? Even if they once did? I doubt the hierarchy would promote someone to bishop if they suspected the whiff of belief. Be far too dangerous.

    Anyway, always amuses me that christians get upset and feel the need to defend their mythical omniscient, omnipotent, vengeful diety. After all, in the olden days, or at least in the myths, he was smiting the non-believers left, right and centre. Why not leave it to it? Or has he run out of puff? Was he operating on software that couldn’t handle Y2K? Is it now in some as yet undiscovered sector of the multiverse, in some Y2K inspired infinite loop?

  43. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 2nd, 2010 at 18:25 | #43

    Freelander, like Antonio Gramsci you hold strong views in respect to peoples religion but who would have thought that in 1937, at the age of 46, Antonio Gramsci accepted Christianity in death. Have to go.

  44. Ernestine Gross
    June 2nd, 2010 at 18:43 | #44


    It seems you have mixed up people and topics @38 because I had nothing to say on religion or President Obama or any other public figure.


    Thank you for the link. The poll results shed no light on my question though. Paranthetically, the actual price increase is higher than 25% because GST is added.

  45. Alice
    June 2nd, 2010 at 18:59 | #45

    @Jack Strocchi
    says “Under Rudd we have entered the Era of Universal Boredom ”

    Wait and see Jack – I cant think of anything more boring than voting the hardline Coalition back in…

    hmm – maybe thats why those watermelons vote in the Greens is rising eh? It couldnt have anything to do with boring Abbott and maybe boring Rudd and more of the same old neoliberalism could it?

    The world is changing under your nose Jack and for a political commentator, you cant see it changing.

    But hey wait…according to Abetz – a vote for the Greens is a vote for Labor and if we vote enough Greens in – we get rid of right wing Labor – whats to whinge about with that (seeing as the rampant right in the Coalition and the rampant right in Labor have stuffed up so badly and its not what the people want).

  46. Freelander
    June 2nd, 2010 at 20:38 | #46

    @Michael of Summer Hill

    I don’t care if the inventor of the Gramophone accepted christianity after he died. I might too. Or might even before. I don’t know what calamities the future may hold. Madness or Alzheimer’s with or without voices, and with or without some deity, belief in magic, or Hogwarts, fairies at the bottom of the garden, crop circles or alien probing. Some mental ailment prior to death certainly cannot be ruled out. And I know, sadly, it has happened to others.

  47. Ron
    June 2nd, 2010 at 21:05 | #47

    In reply to 4 posters

    1/ Fran #38

    “It was IPA commissioned though …”
    thanks for info , but IPA says it all Fran !!

    (a consevative think tank can comission any Poll & design queston to get “there’ answer ,
    am afraid cig tax was ‘boringly” simply Budget related , bilion $’s money needed for Debt , but with a pro health bonus)

    2/ Ernestine Gross
    I thought your #32 was intended to suport th Freelander nonsense linking religous thinking politcans like Obama , Abbott or Rudd to how they stand on public polisys , and thanks for clarification (Hope cigarette tax info assisted re voting effect & less tobacco use & th contradictory but natural postive Budget effect , also smokers vote about 2TPP 60/40 to Labor so expect some lost votes in tax rise)

    3/ Michael of Summer Hill #41
    “Ron, until Tony Abbott comes to his senses I’m afraid the newly-announced and cruel asylum seeker policy will be his undoing…”

    Agree Michael , it is an indecent polisy , and effective contradicts 1951 Convention we oz a Party to However my #31 post point 2/ more addressed querys to you A/ that if Abbott lacked ‘caritas’ then what quality did th Athiest Lib MHR’s lack seeing they ALSO suport that unhumane Lib polisy ? , and B/ if Abbott actualy had that quality (that th Athiest Lib MHR’s lack) then wuld Abbott’s polisy be assylum different ?

    4/ Freelander #42
    “Ron, Obama is more your closet christian…”

    I guess that red hering & inaccurate coment is one way to avoid th damaging rebutal of your lame claims that I listed in #38 (addressed in th 2nd part to Ernistine instead of to you

    EXCEPT Obama is NOT a closet christian whatsoever , but has been repeatedly & PUBLICLY overt on th issue of his firm comitted Christian faith , month after month since his election !

    (and as an aside , also gave 2 hour speech on National US TV to oiver 100 million solely on his faith as well) , so your argument colapses Suggest you forget your hatred of religion , put it ‘in th closet’ , when talking politcs and politcal polisys

  48. Freelander
    June 2nd, 2010 at 21:17 | #48

    Ron, God didn’t tell Obama to invade Iraq, like what ‘e told GW and Blair. (Apparently, he forgot to warn them that the WMDs weren’t there.) In fact, I may be wrong, but I haven’t hear that Obama is on speaking terms with ‘im in the sky, like what GW and Blair think they are.

  49. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 2nd, 2010 at 21:43 | #49

    Ron, I am only querying Tony Abbott’s convictions and not those of others.

  50. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 2nd, 2010 at 21:50 | #50

    Freelander, your point is taken but you fail to understand the good work being done by religious organisations in helping those in need.

  51. Freelander
    June 2nd, 2010 at 22:07 | #51

    By the way, I don’t hate christians. Its more a case of love the dangerous nutcases, hate the nuts.

  52. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 2nd, 2010 at 22:25 | #52

    Freelander, you have me baffled. Who and what are you referring to.

  53. Freelander
    June 2nd, 2010 at 22:29 | #53


  54. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 2nd, 2010 at 22:53 | #54

    Alleluia Freelander.

  55. June 3rd, 2010 at 06:17 | #55

    @Michael of Summer Hill

    … but who would have thought that in 1937, at the age of 46, Antonio Gramsci accepted Christianity in death.

    Not I. The claim is purely a fascist-catholic exercise in verballing an honest leftist in an attempt to strengthen the Italian state.

    This claim derives from the attempt of the Catholic Church to slander a leftist imprisoned under fascism. Gramsci, muted in prison, cannot speak for himself from the grave.

    The fact remains that the records of the Italian state don’t record any visit from a priest to Gramsci, so Luigi de Magistris’s claim must be a vicious lie.

  56. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 3rd, 2010 at 06:55 | #56

    Fran Barlow, initially there were rumours that Gramsci reverted to Christianity and I have no reason to doubt Archbishop Luigi De Magistris word.

  57. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 3rd, 2010 at 07:14 | #57

    Update, Update, Update, latest reports suggest the mining sector is toning down its tough stance and ready to engage with the Federal government over Resources Rent Tax.

  58. June 3rd, 2010 at 07:19 | #58

    @Michael of Summer Hill

    initially there were rumours that Gramsci reverted to Christianity and I have no reason to doubt Archbishop Luigi De Magistris word.

    This is the wrong way to look at it. In the absence of positive evidence, and especially when one may presume a pecuniary (or as in this case) a political interest in lying you must have an adequate reason to believe someone’s witness. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, and Gramsci rejected metaphysics for his entire political life. It seems utterly improbable that Gramsci would wish to be recalled as disavowing his life’s work. This is nothing but a shabby attempt to murder his memory.

    Coming as it does from an officer of a large scale and well resourced criminal syndicate, perhaps the biggest on the planet and in the absence of corroboration from the fascists at the time, there are persuasive reasons for treating this as self-serving mendacity.

  59. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 3rd, 2010 at 07:34 | #59

    Fran Barlow, untill the Italian State opennly denies Archbishop Luigi De Magistris word, then I have no reason to disbelieve the Archbishop for it was known that an elderly nun who cared for Gramsci reported a conversion.

  60. Fran Barlow
    June 3rd, 2010 at 08:48 | #60

    @Michael of Summer Hill

    You are reversing the onus of proof here. An extraordinary claim has been made by those with an ideological interest in slander. Saying that someone unnamed has claimed that some “elderly nun reported a conversion” is non-specific hearsay at several removes. It doesn’t amount to what would be needed to sustain such a slander.

    Either put up robust evidence or admit that it is mere scurrilous rumour spread by the longest standing criminal organisation in human history.

  61. smiths
    June 3rd, 2010 at 11:29 | #61

    surely the landowners are the longest standing criminal organisation in human history

  62. Freelander
    June 3rd, 2010 at 11:53 | #62

    @Fran Barlow

    I’d have to agree with Fran. The self serving word of some delusional elderly nun, a member of an evil cult with a two millennia history of crimes against humanity, and of the cult hierarchy. Not exactly irrefutable evidence.

  63. Freelander
    June 3rd, 2010 at 11:54 | #63

    Anyway, even if true it is irrelevant.

  64. Fran Barlow
    June 3rd, 2010 at 11:54 | #64


    Landowners are a heterogenous group lacking organisational discipline and executive continuity. There is no central landowners council instructing landowners how to deal with others or appointing new landowners to take over the remits of old landowners, so no, Smiths, while they may as individuals be guilty of crimes against the commons, and conspire to protect those interests they are not a criminal syndicate in the sense that the Catholic Church is.

  65. Fran Barlow
    June 3rd, 2010 at 11:58 | #65


    Not exactly irrefutable evidence.

    Not any evidence at all. It is not even clear that the nun or the claim exists, except in the mind of MOSH. Why he would be keen on Berlusconi’s witness on anything is also something with which he could amuse us all.

  66. June 3rd, 2010 at 12:03 | #66

    Update, Update, Update, another unsupported claim by MoSH that just so happens to support the Rudd line.
    (sorry, that’s not news, is it.)

  67. June 3rd, 2010 at 13:06 | #67

    Fran [email protected]#5 said:

    This claim derives from the attempt of the Catholic Church to slander a leftist imprisoned under fascism.

    The ironic thing is that if Gramsci had not been imprisoned he would have fled to the USSR where he would undoubtedly have been Gulaged and shot in quick time. So the fascists probably extended his life expectancy. They were also good enough to give him writing materials so he could continue the long and honourable tradition of political dissidents prison memoirs. Russell, Bonhoefer…er…Hitler. Well, mostly honourable.

    It must be conceded that the Italian fascists were not all bad, excesses of the Abyssinian adventure notwithstanding. They were always more Italian is substance and fascistic in style. They never went in a big way into concentrations camps, secret police, area bombing, ethnic cleansing or mass purges. Such a splendid railway station at Milan.

    My father had some time for them, and he was a partisan. According to him their biggest mistake was allying with the Tedeschi.

  68. June 3rd, 2010 at 13:32 | #68

    Fran [email protected] #8 & #14 said:

    Coming as it does from an officer of a large scale and well resourced criminal syndicate, perhaps the biggest on the planet and in the absence of corroboration from the fascists at the time, there are persuasive reasons for treating this as self-serving mendacity.

    Whereas we can take the word of Gramsci’s Communist apologists at face value, perish the thought that they would ever bend the truth for political purposes. No “self-serving mendacity” from that quarter, not on your nellie!

    I am interested in your characterisation of the Catholic Church as a “criminal syndicate, perhaps the biggest on the planet…the longest standing criminal organisation in human history”. The comments policy on this blog forbids “racist and sexist” comments, with a rather expansive definition of those classifications. But there is no regulation of religious vilification, which I gather is the intent of your statement. So I guess it passes muster.

    I wonder if you, or Pr Q, would have any objection to describing Islamics as “towel-headed camel-jockeys”, Judaics as “tax-avoiding parasites” or any of the other of the sectarian stereotypes that have been doing the rounds these past thousand years or so. Just askin’.

  69. Neil
    June 3rd, 2010 at 13:44 | #69


    Can I distract you from your impression of the “it’s only a flesh wound” Monty Python knight for just one second to ask… “Judaics”? And did you just suggest that someone else was indulging in ethnic slurs?

  70. Fran Barlow
    June 3rd, 2010 at 14:15 | #70

    @Jack Strocchi

    For someone who claims to understand nuance, your response above is embarrassing. I have not vilified individual adherents of catholic doctrine as criminal in virtue of their doctrine or religious affiliation as yanyone folowing your references to Jews and Muslims would have been.

    It is my view that the Catholic Church is a criminal organisation regardless of its ostensible doctrine. The doctrine is an artefact of their organisational solidarity and their need to recruit new foot soldiers.

  71. June 3rd, 2010 at 14:20 | #71

    [email protected] #19 said:

    Can I distract you from your impression of the “it’s only a flesh wound” Monty Python knight for just one second to ask… “Judaics”?

    If “Judaic” is now considered an “ethnic slur” then I guess we may as well walk around in sack cloth and eat ashes for everything we do is a sin. Political correctness gone mad.

    Neil said:

    And did you just suggest that someone else was indulging in ethnic slurs?

    I did not “suggest that someone else was indulging in ethnic slurs”. I quoted Fran Barlow’s multiple uses of a sectarian stereotype. One that is now pretty common on Left-liberal web sites and media. Which would not be tolerated if directed at Muslims or Jews. But apparently Catholic Christians are fair game. Some religions are more equal than others, it appears.

    It should go without saying, but does not in the wilfully obtuse world of blogging, that I quote these sectarian slurs in order to deplore, rather than deploy, them. But liberal use of “scare quotation marks” would not stop a reader bent on disingenuity.

  72. Ernestine Gross
    June 3rd, 2010 at 14:21 | #72

    Its getting ugly again.

  73. jquiggin
    June 3rd, 2010 at 14:27 | #73

    Enough! I haven’t got time to police things as closely as I would like, but can everyone please steer clear of religious and ethnic disputes, and stop the inter-commenter slanging matches.

    In particular, regardless of where it started, please stop the discussion of Gramsci, Catholicism etc.

    For any further comments in this thread, please indicate the topic you are talking about and avoid anything that might be construed as criticism of other commenters. If you can’t make your point with reference to the issues alone, please save it for later.

  74. Neil
    June 3rd, 2010 at 14:28 | #74

    ‘Judaic’ is an adjective. It is commonly insulting to use adjectives as nouns. Ask an autistic or a schizophrenic. I shouldn’t have responded to this, and I won’t again. It is so dispiriting. I shouldn’t even read the comments (ditto). I should add that Jack is far from the worst of it.

  75. Neil
    June 3rd, 2010 at 14:30 | #75

    Sorry, JQ. We cross-posted: I didn’t deliberately ignore your request.

  76. Fran Barlow
    June 3rd, 2010 at 14:58 | #76

    Fine with me PrQ. Now that the initial vicious slur has been refuted and its etiology established, we can and should move on.

  77. Ron
    June 3rd, 2010 at 17:34 | #77

    My first blog for today

    It seems these politcal Sites purpose is abused as a front for zealot Christan-hating Athiests to blog , and whose sole claim to infamy is intolerant slur posts attacking religon

    How shalow , a branch of Athiest religion which solely beleives in no religion sort of a “Claytons religion” & needs to vent its hate

    I supose given per latest Polls 81% of aussies say tyhery’re culturaly religious , and a further 8% hav no opinion either way , it leaves remaining 11% feeling impotent , and so i guess there frustration at there irlevanse is vented in blogs

    Amusing that this pitiful branch of Athiesm is usualy th fringe left liberal progresives Grouping… Yet th stark contradiction is they claim to be ‘left’ , but concurently display lack of toleranse and then furthermore happily vilify (yet claim vilifying aginst othr Groups is indecent)

    Michael of Summer Hill #49

    Libs Assylum Agenda
    “Ron, I am only querying Tony Abbott’s convictions and not those of others”.

    Michael I do not query his convictons at all Tony Abbotts Assylum polisy and indeed that of majority Lib Party MHR’s in total , is obviously not influencd one iota that some ar religious and a few ar Athiests

    This Lib polisy simply reflects a combination of 1/ consevative Lib beliefs for oz security & harmony that far more harm than good will happen unless tough deterent measures ar taken to stop a ‘flood’ , and 2/ polital benefits in holding there votin base plus gaining swing voters thru scaring them/appeal to prejudise

    Now point 1/ Lib beliefs is ALSO adopted over many Lib polisy areas so no suprise
    Whereas Labors polisy on Assylum as with many Labor polisy areas from Taxation shares to IR Workchoises to Schools to Hospitals etc conflicts because it is influenced by sosial equity , humane , and a non privilege fair go

    I am not sure as a rsult whether my judgement of Abbott & Libs Party ‘convictions’ for there indecent assylum seeker polisy is more or equaly harsh as yours seeimg ypu question th ‘convictions’ whereas I dont question th convictons but dont like th ‘convictions’ philosphy core logic

  78. Alice
    June 3rd, 2010 at 19:30 | #78

    Oops sorry JQ – Im not responsible for this ugliness here (not me this time) but I posted two posts on the one thread heading in one day on the early retirement thing. So sorry.

  79. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 3rd, 2010 at 21:55 | #79

    Fran Barlow & Freelander, I now ask you to provide primary evidence whereby the Italian State has refuted Archbishop Luigi De Magistris claim.

  80. June 3rd, 2010 at 22:04 | #80

    @Michael of Summer Hill

    Note this post above, MOSH:


    Case is closed and in any event, I dealt with your challenge on this ground earlier. The onus is on you.

  81. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 3rd, 2010 at 22:36 | #81

    Update, Update, Update, the Rudd government will be pleased to hear Australia has recorded the first trade surplus in 13 months whereby exports jumped by 11 per cent in April and positive contribution tothe trade balance of goods and services surplus worth $134 million.

  82. Michael of Summer Hill
    June 4th, 2010 at 06:39 | #82

    Update, Update, Update, according to the latest reports Petro Giorgiou ripped into the neo-conservatives arguing that “The emergence of the pernicious influence of Hansonism stirred racial prejudice; multiculturalism, one of Australia’s exceptional accomplishments, was denigrated; asylum seekers were subjected to increasingly harsh measures. Our civil liberties came under challenge after September 11, and the proud Australian tradition of inclusive citizenship was, without sound justification, reversed’. Thumbs up Petro.

  83. Ernestine Gross
    June 4th, 2010 at 07:03 | #83

    The before tax increase in the minimum wage, effective from next months, is approximately equal to the after tax increase in the price of a carton of cigarettes.

    Source of data for the minimum wage increase:


Comments are closed.