Life in General

Creative giving part 3

John Quiggin470 Comments

Aus-Halfmoon-Wattle-2

I haven’t managed to come up with a creative new idea for helping the tsunami aid appeals, so I’m going to copy Michele Agnew. From now until midnight Sunday, I’ll give one $A to the Australian Red Cross tsunami appeal for each comment[1] I receive on this post, up to a maximum of 1000.

To add a tiny element of novelty, I’m inviting others to join the effort by sponsoring this offer at whatever rate they can afford. You can work out your maximum exposure from the limit, for example, if you offer 5 cents a comment, you’re promising to give up to $50.

If you’re interested, please send me an email at j dot quiggin at uq dot edu dot au. I’ll record it in the updates with your name, pseudonym or anonymously as you prefer. When the appeal is over, I’ll write and tell you how much you’ve promised. Feel free to nominate a charity of your choice.

Update The Eudora mail server is running hot, with the first contributor to join the effort already coming through:
“William Burroughs’ Baboon” says pls put me down for 10c per comment
Update 10:12 pm An anonymous regular reader offers 50 cents per comment, nominating World Vision
rdb offers 50 cents per comment
Nicholas Gruen offers to match me dollar for dollar, in return for an ad. Accepted!
That’s $4.10 $3.10 per comment! (sorry for late-night arithmetic errors)

Update 6am
An anonymous regular reader offers 15c per comment
“Saint Straightjacket” offers 20c per comment, up to $300

So we’re up to $3.45 per comment, and the total amount raised is nearly $500, with most of the day still left to come.

It’s particularly good to see lots of visitors from Tim Blair’s blog – a reminder that, whatever our disagreements, we can all work together at a time like this.

In the comments, Tim has offered $100 if I shave my beard off. That’s nowhere near enough, but I’m eager to secure Tim’s money for the cause so I’m making a counteroffer in the spirit of national unity and cash for comment. If Tim will give $100, I’ll write a 200 word post saying exclusively good things about John Howard. I’m willing to increase the amount proportionally for further pledges from Tim’s (or my) readers, until I run out of good things to say.

Update 10:30am We’re well over 200 comments now, and thanks to the generosity of cosponsors, within sight of the original target of $1000, with the capacity to raise a lot more

wmmbb has offered 20c a comment, up to a total of 500
Mark Bahnisch has offered 10c a comment

I’m really impressed by all of this. Quite a few cosponsors have offered more, in relation to their means, than my starting offer. This is one area where I’m unreservedly in favour of competition, and I’m already thinking about my next move.

I’d also like to thank everyone who’s linked to the post. In particular, I now have a full set of Tims, at least among the blogs I read regularly: Tim Blair, Tim Dunlop, Tim Lambert and Tim T have all sent visitors this way. For any other Tims or non-Tims who want to link, there’s still more than 12 hours to go.

Update 1:34pm
Crossing the ideological divide, Andrew Norton offers 10c a comment
Paul2 also offers 10c
wmmbb offers 10c more
Harry Clarke offers 20c up to 500 comments

That puts us over $4 a comment, and with well over 300 comments, we’ve easily passed the original goal of $1000. But there’s still plenty of money on the table, so keep the comments coming in.

I forgot to mention it when I put this post up, and I’m not going to worry too much about it today, but this is a PG blog, so no more coarse language, please. Double entendres and dirty jokes are fine, as long as they’re funny.

I’ve had the first taker on the Howard challenge. “2dogs” has sent in his $50 to the Red Cross, and emailed me the receipt, earning 100 words of sincere praise from me for John Howard, to be published as soon as I’ve tallied up the donations and tied myself to the keyboard. Come on Howard-lovers, and set me a real challenge. I could write that much defending Don Rumsfeld, and have done so. 1000 words in praise of Howard might give me some trouble.

And here’s the ad I promised Nicholas Gruen, who’s agreed to match my donations. If you click here you can see a further generous offer from him.

<img src="wordpress/wp-content/images/Peachanimatedgifbanner.gif" href="http://www.peachhomeloans.com.au/quiggin.htm&quot;

Update 6pm We’ve passed 400 comments and raised more than $1500. Looking at the current pace, there should be more than 500 comments by the time the appeal ends, but probably not many more than 600. A number of cosponsors have limited their contributions to an upper bound of 500 comments, thereby giving themselves a fair bit of certainty. Now I’m appealing for some risk-tolerant types to cosponsor the remaining comments, starting at number 501. Why don’t you put in, say, 50 cents a comment. There’s a small risk that you might be hit for $250, but in the absence of a last-minute surge, it’s more likely to be around $50.

Update 10:30pm

Jack Strocchi and Claire Rodda have promised 10c per comment up to 500

Down and Out in Sài Gòn has promised 50c for each comment over 500. At this stage, it looks as if he(?) will get off cheaply, so let’s have a flood of last-minute comments.

Final Midnight has come to Queensland, and we ended up with 470 comments. I’m off to bed now, but in the morning I’ll send my own contribution, rounded up to $500, and advise commenters how much they’ve promised to pay.

fn1. At my absolute discretion, I’ll delete bots, spammers, repetitive commenters etc. If you don’t trust me to act fairly in this respect, don’t participate.

470 thoughts on “Creative giving part 3”

  3. Well, for the sake of getting a discussion going, I declare this a peculiar thing to do. Why not just (1) decide how much you want to donate, (2) do it?

  4. I am all for these stunts. They keep the issue alive and are thus effective in maximising the final amount of aid that will be received by the victims. And that is the only matter of importance. (Also this type of public challenge giving does not exclude any prior private donation that may have already been made.)

  5. Excellent initiative, John. I’ve noticed that the papers are already shrinking coverage of the Tsunami aftermath so wbb’s commendation of efforts to keep the situation alive are salient.

  7. good onya prof.

    this method looks to have become nearly “the way” bloggers are raising funds for this disaster

  8. Excellent work Professor Q! The generous response to this disaster threatens to restore my faith in humanity.

  11. I have to wonder with the whole world all given those affected by the tragedy half the global income (an exaggeration) do they really need any more?

    Do they not just need people in there helping to rebuild? Perhaps an army factory that can prefab some temporary accommodation en masse?

  12. After today’s effort, Vee, I plan to redirect my giving towards general foreign aid. But I think one more big fundraising push won’t do any harm.

  13. It is pleasing to see that you are supporting your fellow Australians John. I praise your efforts and look forward to seeing the number of comments can be left on this web site. I’d almost propose to you if you weren’t a leftie (I’d also consider it if you have a shave…. otherwise you would remind me too much of Janette.)

  19. foresight.org has used a matching donation appeal. Someone offers a sizeable donation to be matched by other donors.

  21. This is an excellent idea, John, and I’ve just linked you on my blog… but you may have to up the celebrity quotient to keep my readers interested.

  23. Sydney’s Sri Lankans turned out in force today for a food fare at Carlington to raise funds. Wonderful people, wonderful food.

  24. Tsunami appeal
    Australia is having a national day of mourning and reflection for tsunami victims tomorrow. Copying an idea from Michele Agnew, a little while back I’ve set up a post and will give a dollar (Australian) for each comment1 on this…

  27. Well worth making a comment. Gee, at $4.10 for charity, this might be the most valuable blog comment I’ve ever made!

  32. A more interesting question would be to find out what percentage of the gazillions people have freely given will actually be spent helping victims and what percentage will enhance the bank accounts of “leaders” from all sides of the globe.

    Run a pool and let bloggers and posters pick a number. I’ll start the ball rolling with 97% = leaders; 2% = lost in the mail; 1% = actual relief aid to victims.

  42. erp – definite darkside reader – shits himself that maybe not every cent will go where it’s most required. Better not to give then. Better someone dies than some aid truck driver somewhere treats himself to a cold Bintang on the way.

  43. im happy to see your giving this money to a group that will actually do constructive work with it and not have it end up in a rich crony or dictators’ swiss bank accout

  44. wbb – I don’t have a problem with the truck driver, but more with the talking mouths jetting around the world and filling up expensive hotel rooms. But a little due diligence in selecting your favorite aid group should go a long way in reducing that loss.

Comments are closed.