Home > General > test

test

October 13th, 2005

Just testing

Categories: General Tags:
  1. Terje Petersen
    October 13th, 2005 at 18:30 | #1

    I agree. But just this once.

  2. October 13th, 2005 at 18:31 | #2

    Not so fast, Terje. I’d like to hear JQ’s arguments before agreeing to this test.

  3. October 13th, 2005 at 18:54 | #3

    Teste,testes!
    Peter, you have no balls.

    This academic is trying to make a test, a test.
    Why wait for the argument?

  4. October 13th, 2005 at 18:58 | #4

    Finally figured out to use

    blockquotes!

    I feel now that all my investment into human capital is finally yielding some positive returns.

  5. October 13th, 2005 at 21:23 | #5

    Human capital is amazing stuff. We might use it more often.

  6. October 14th, 2005 at 18:05 | #6

    The only capital we can squander, and it just breeds again.

  7. October 15th, 2005 at 13:36 | #7

    sigh…to be honest I expected a little more substance in this thread.

    Oh well.

  8. Terje Petersen
    October 15th, 2005 at 16:13 | #8

    Oh please tell me how to do blockquotes!

    Please.

  9. Andrew Reynolds
    October 15th, 2005 at 16:19 | #9

    Terje,
    If you want to look like Jack Strocchi even more you need to learn

    block quotes.

    Otherwise, don’t bother. Just continue to test.

  10. kez
    October 15th, 2005 at 16:39 | #10

    Terence, peace of mind is expecting the worst and accepting it.

    Test on!

    For that matter, bring on the the IR changes while we’re at it, it’s a beautiful spring day and i’m feeling tolerant…

  11. October 15th, 2005 at 17:18 | #11

    It is amazing how much discussion a two word post can create. Minimalist blogging?

  12. October 15th, 2005 at 18:31 | #12

    Post-modern, indeed!

  13. October 15th, 2005 at 18:53 | #13

    Just by the way, if you have missed the link to proposed “Ant-errorism” laws, (sic), they are available on my site.

  14. October 15th, 2005 at 19:04 | #14

    It’s part of an elaborate stimulus-response project, to examine the extent to which an innoculous word can trigger an avalanche of brainstorming and witty rejoinders.

    As advertised, it is indeed a test. Of us.

    The usual pattern on Usenet (and a certain anti-Margo blog) is that the quality of responses degenerates with the number of replies. Because there was so little to start with, on this thread it can only get better (which it has, at least until this post)!

  15. October 15th, 2005 at 19:43 | #15

    Peter, you show great acceptance of the test.
    Love your humility in the last line ,but uncertain of “the academic”.

  16. October 16th, 2005 at 10:44 | #16

    Terje (and anyone else):
    How to do blockquotes:

    Let’s say I want to blockquote:
    “John has a nice beard, but what’s he hiding behind it?”

    You need to use the html tag [blockquote] to start and [/blockquote] to end it using instead of [ and ]. It’s very important that you remember to close your blockquotes.

    So
    [blockquote]John has a nice beard.[/blockquote]

    when replaced [ and ] with it looks like:

    John has a nice beard.

  17. October 16th, 2005 at 10:49 | #17

    *sigh*
    That didn’t make much sense because html tags get deleted when you post. You need to use the ‘less than’ symbol (shift comma) instead of [ and the ‘greater than’ symbol (shift period) for it to work.

  18. October 16th, 2005 at 10:51 | #18

    … and the ‘greater than’ symbol (shift period) instead of ] for it to work.

  19. pdf23ds
    October 16th, 2005 at 14:33 | #19

    Are you sure you can’t write … in a comment?

    Not without messing up my system – JQ

  20. pdf23ds
    October 16th, 2005 at 14:35 | #20

    Hehe. I guess not. How weird. <blockquote>.

  21. pdf23ds
    October 16th, 2005 at 14:37 | #21

    That was difficult. I had to type in “& amp;lt;blockquote& amp;lt;”, without the spaces. The preview doesn’t match what gets shown.

Comments are closed.