The RSL says no to war with Saddam. More precisely, it sets out sensible conditions: clear evidence of danger, a specific UN resolution, a plan for postwar reconstruction.
A couple of observations on this. First, I’d guess that this means that the RSL is now dominated by people who were in Korea and Vietnam, rather than WWII, and are therefore unimpressed by slogans like “All the way with the USA”.
Second, as is pretty much the norm, I used the term “sensible” in the first para to mean “agrees with me”. I can see that this is problematic, but I can’t think of any *sensible* alternative.