6 thoughts on “Alarmed and alert

  1. Joanne wrote: “….a means of garnering citizen support for the terrorism laws presently facing parliament”

    This coming from an academic that is supposed to be trainied in rationale thinking.

  2. Roberto, your responses so far here and on Jane’s site have been a) argument from personal incredulity and b) Ad Hominem attacks. Not exactly taking the high ground, is it?

  3. I’d have thought ‘cui bono?’ (‘who benefits?’) was a legitimate area for academic inquiry.

    Meanwhile, Roberto needs perhaps to take a few deep breaths before hastening into print: two spelling errors and a syntactical blunder in a 14-word sentence. Tut-tut.

Comments are closed.