12 thoughts on “Adani and NEG

  1. The conversation article was a bewdy I thought so I highlighted it.

    I don’t think many coalition rednecks realise coal powered energy and dispatchable power are b not conducive for each other.

  2. The IEEFA report on Abbot Point is here: http://ieefa.org/ieefa-australia-escalating-financial-risk-adanis-abbot-point-coal-terminal/
    As far as I can make out, the port is still a cash cow, and very profitable by itself – but Adani have bled it white to prop up other lossmaking parts of the empire.

    May be worth noting that while coking coal is a safe business for the moment, as alternative sources are hard to come by and the structural decline of pig iron making is slow, that does not hold in the long run. Direct reduction of iron ore with natural gas as a known technology , and Austrian steelmaker Voestalpine have opened a large DRI plant in Corpus Christi, Texas. The same company is leading an EU-funded project to replace natural gas with catalysed hydrogen, at pilot not lab scale. The chemistry is straightforward, Ur’s basically a matter of cost. At the moment a shift to this technology would not work without a carbon price, but that is no longer inconceivable. And as renewables expand, there are prospects of large potential supplies of near-free electricity that would otherwise be curtailed.

  3. If Turnbull thinks he can deliver policy certainty he’s dreaming. Although I suspect that isn’t the real intent here, rather it’s that the LNP hopes that blame for failure to deliver it can be shifted onto others for not coming on board with this NEG policy.

    It believe that no energy policy certainty can emerge without a policy that enables a ramping transition to low to below zero emissions; energy cannot be detached from climate and emissions because the climate problem is never ever going to go away, not in the lifetimes of Australians now living. The increasing frequency and intensity of real world impact of climate change will bring the intersection of energy, emissions and climate back into the spotlight again and again and again.

    Tricky wordplay is indeed the foundation of LNP energy and climate policy – coal plants are renamed “low emissions” as well as “dispatchable”, gas plants that let us down when most needed are “reliable”, cutting support for renewable energy as it approaches the last hurdles to becoming affordable and reliable is named “energy guarantee”. And reaching emissions targets are not a road to climate stability, they are kowtowing to economically harmful “green” led international agreements.

    But the debate has changed; except for the hard core Right Australians no longer fear the economic impacts of renewable energy and except for the hard core right, voters accept that the climate problem is real. Turnbull’s use of economic alarmist fears of renewables and Abbott’s reversion to climate science denial no longer have the resonance they did even at the time of the last federal elections. Gestures to appease the hard Right will lose them moderates to Labor, Gestures to appease the moderates will lose them the hard Right to ON and Bernardi’s AC.

    Despite energy policy being a losing game, where delay has stopped being their friend and misdirection and blame shifting are losing efficacy, Turnbull has no other options but to misdirect and hope that ongoing policy certainty can be blamed on others for not getting on board with this NEG policy.

  4. George Christensen is negative about the NEG. He has realised that it puts a cap on emissions.

    This is where Malcolm Turnbull is too clever by half. He thinks he can fool enough of the people enough of the time. And not just that, he thinks he can fool different people in different ways. But he only ends up fooling himself.

  5. Judith Brett wrote a good article, published in the august Monthly, outlining Turnbulls obstacles (as represented by T Abbott) and advised that in the face of consistently poor polls now was the time for Turnbull to grasp the nettle and make some policy decisions that could break the cycle. Two issues were SSM and emissions/energy. The time has passed and it seems that Turnbull has missed out on an opportunity to put his own stamp on the country.

  6. @James Wimberley
    James it seems that the Adani holding of the 99 year lease on Abbot point is ultimately in the Caymans. So it won’t show too much of a taxable profit in Oz. Adani has a significant re-finance of Abbot Point coming up and that might be a problem for them, more so if the lenders come to see that Carmichael is very dubious.
    I understand the 60 million tons per year projected output has been revised down to 25 million tons. That will reflect in the proposed expansion of the port. The quadrupling of Abbot Point capacity could be deferred. I was told also the the port was only running at half capacity right now, leaving export space without too much capex.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s