Belated congratulations

As everyone knows by now, the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel went to Edmund Phelps. Phelps award is one of the relatively rare cases where the Economics Nobel has genuinely been awarded for a single big discovery rather than for a research program. By incorporating inflation expectations into the Philips curve, Phelps killed the idea of a stable long-run trade-off between unemployment and inflation, and, in effect, predicted the emergence of inflation in the 1970s. As Phelps himself noted, the implication of the new model that there exists a ‘natural’ or ‘non-accelerating inflation’ rate of unemployment has not fared nearly so well, but the central point that there is nothing to be gained, in the long run, by allowing inflation rates to rise, remains valid.

Congratulations also to the winner of the Peace Prize, Muhammed Yunus who founded the microcredit provider Grameen Bank

Even more belatedly, Australian Terry Tao shared the Fields Medal in mathematics back in August for his contributions to partial differential equations, combinatorics, harmonic analysis and additive number theory.

11 thoughts on “Belated congratulations

  1. A question John. Which economist in your opinion deserved to win the Nobel Prize for Economics the most but did not?

  2. Assuming we confine attention to people who have died since the prize was first awarded, and didn’t get it, the outstanding candidate was Joan Robinson.

  3. On the other prize – good to see a banker get it. Innovation in banking is not something normally associated with peace, but I think this was well worth it.

  4. Um… I would say that sustained inflation is always of value, not overall but to certain persons and groups. This is an area where the who/whom question matters very much.

  5. One thing I’ve noticed is that other than Joan Robinson I can’t really think of another notable female economist.

  6. Trevor Swan should have won the Nobel Prize. His (nearly identical) theory of economic growth was published the same year as Solow’s, but Solow got the credit and the Nobel Prize; Swans’ theory of internal/external balance was published around the same time as similar work by Mundell, but Mundell got the credit and the Nobel Prize, and Swan did pathbreaking work on econometric models at the same time as Klein, but Klein got the credit and the Nobel Prize.

    If Swan had been based in the US or Europe rather than Australia he would have had honours showered on him.

  7. No Joan Robinson actually wrote in english so one could understnd what she was saying.
    She couldn’t possibly win an award!

  8. Homer, a number of economists with no maths have won the Nobel Prize.

    Joan Robinson once turned down the offer of being Vice President of the Econometric Society because it meant she would have had to sit on the editorial board of Econmetrica and she didn’t want to be an editor of a journal she couldn’t read.

    It is also rumoured that she turned down the Nobel.

  9. Uncle Milton I wasn’t merely referring to maths or is it more accurate to say stats?
    try reading about the cambridge controversies or even imperfect competition and understand what the people are talking about without reading Joan.

    She was not only a great economist ( does anybody else remember her on monday conference?) but a wonderful and very readable writer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s