Monday message board

It’s time, once again for the Monday Message Board. As usual, civilised discussion and absolutely no coarse language, please. Feel free to add your thoughts, loya or otherwise, on the Queens Birthday.

10 thoughts on “Monday message board

  1. John,

    I’ve been wondering recently about the use of heuristics in academic economics and I’m interested in your view …

    Do academic economists show a tendancy to master a few key techniques and then apply them to different situations rather than approaching each problem afresh?

  2. I have once or twice speculated that the US denialism on climate change might stem from a belief that the impact of climate change on the US will be less than the impact on other countries. This item from The Independent indicates that the cost to the US might be greater than perhaps the Americans think. An extract:

    “America is facing its worst summer drought since the Dust Bowl years of the Great Depression. Or perhaps worse still.

    “From the mountains and desert of the West, now into an eighth consecutive dry year, to the wheat farms of Alabama, where crops are failing because of rainfall levels 12 inches lower than usual, to the vast soupy expanse of Lake Okeechobee in southern Florida, which has become so dry it actually caught fire a couple of weeks ago, a continent is crying out for water…

    “Climatologists see a growing volatility in the south-east’s weather – today’s drought coming close on the heels of devastating hurricanes two to three years ago. In the West, meanwhile, a growing body of scientific evidence suggests a movement towards a state of perpetual drought by the middle of this century. “The 1930s drought lasted less than a decade. This is something that could remain for 100 years,” said Richard Seager a climatologist at Columbia University…â€?

  3. gordon,
    Of course, it could stem from a belief, logical or otherwise, that they are right.
    The 1930s drought was pre-AGW. They may believe that this is the same.
    Not saying they are right (or wrong).

  4. I was amazed to hear on last nights Four Corners, lawyers for the Australian Government had argued in court that the government had no obligation to protect the human rights of Australians incarcerated overseas.

    Is this the same governement that argues that we should vote for them because they will protect us from terrorism… Or maybe it depends on your skin colour.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s