The Right Swindles Itself on Global Warming

Apparently under pressure from rightwingers inlcuding Janet Albrechtsen on its board the ABC will broadcast The Great Global Warming Swindle tomorrow night. This piece looks like being the last hurrah for the delusionists in Australia – even JA herself seems to have got the memo recently.

I’m not going to bother with the tired talking points presented in Durkin’s film. The Wikipedia article (to which I’ve contributed a bit) does an excellent job on it, as on most forms of delusionism, and there are more critiques here. Paul Norton notes that some of the most clearly bogus elements have been cut from the version to be shown here, but the basic claim, that thousands of scientists and all the world’s major scientific organizations are engaged in a gigantic fraud (directed from beyond the grave by Margaret Thatcher!), remains right out there in LaRouche/Lavoisier territory.

The more interesting point to me, is the way the political right in Australia is swindling itself here.

To begin with, I’ll observe that, AFAIK, no significant commentator on the Australian right has criticised the film (I’m labelling Harry Clarke as a centrist here) and many have endorsed it. (Counterexamples will be gratefully accepted and prominently publicized)

To the extent that this pattern of implicit or explicit endorsement isn’t purely opportunistic it’s indicative of the extent to which the those on the right have come to be complicit in their own delusion, disdaining factual evidence in favor of wishful thinking and a magical belief in the power of ritually repeated talking points. It is a notable reversal of the situation a few decades ago, when there was a lot of pressure on the left to endorse (or at least tacitly accept) various kinds of fringe science and anti-scientific rhetoric. The same pattern has been evident in relation to the Iraq war, and reflects a willingness to take the standards of evidence used in partisan political debate and apply them to issues where reality will bite no matter how clever the rhetoric.

By now, though, I doubt that, to the extent that they adhere to a notion of objective reality at all, many on the right seriously think these claims are defensible. Rather, they apparently believe that it is a good thing that they should be aired. Perhaps a handful of them are serious devotees of Voltaire and John Stuart Mill, but given their reaction to (say) the films of Michael Moore, the number of free speech absolutists on the Australian right cannot be large. In any case, devotion to free speech shouldn’t stop those with critical views from airing them. So, I conclude, those who welcome the film being shown must think it is politically beneficial to their cause. Presumably the idea is that creating doubt on the science will reduce support for effective action to stabilize the climate.

This just seems silly to me. The Australian public has made up its collective mind on this issue, and the government has been at pains to assure us that it accepts mainstream science on the topic. Now, we are presented with ample evidence that its ideological backers are just as far out on the lunatic fringe as ever. As Paul Norton observes:

I must say that from the standpoint of partisan political calculation, given the state of public opinion on climate change it may not be a bad thing to have such tripe being screened in a Federal election year at the behest of an ABC board cluttered with Howard government appointees, and for a very loud chorus of greenhouse denialism to be sustained by prominent supporters and allies of the Howard government. Messrs. Rudd and Garrett will hopefully ensure that this is not lost on the voters.

The main inference to be drawn from this sorry episode is that there is no-one among the government’s supporters who is intelligent enough to see through this fraud, honest enough to admit that it is a fraud and brave enough to say so out loud.

28 thoughts on “The Right Swindles Itself on Global Warming

  1. I’ve just turned off the telly, being unable to stand it for a moment longer. Where did the ABC find all those LaRouchian nutters for the audience? Thanks melanie for the nutter family tree…

  2. I did not watch, as i suspected that it would be only a political and corporate message, not far out from an election.
    Regardless of the ABC being touted as leftist by the Federal government and oil and mining corporates, the ABC is controlled wholly by the Federal government.
    It has used fear to deny the staff their right to freedom of speech. There are only a couple of staff who have called John Howard’s bluff.
    I am 68, and have been an observer of Nature and human nature, from an early age.
    There are always two sides to every debate, unfortunately only one side is dominant in the current debate on climate change, due to having the power to mislead and manipulate public thinking.
    Not many of us have the qualifications to debate this most important issue, those with the megaphones are just the same as the rest of us, but they have more to lose politically and fiscally.

  3. R C P (without the spaces) is what’s being blocked by the spam filter. I worked that out by a process of elimination.

    LaRouche is American right? His version of the R C P used to ascribe anything and everything to a Rockefeller-CIA conspiracy. I believe that one of Nelson R’s daughters was a member – which goes to show how ludicrous it was. Possible LaR disbanded it when he went over to the right – making way for a new generation of nutters? Or maybe it’s only Mao who could see through the Rocky (the headlines of their newspaper always called him that) plot. Was there a British splinter group after the LaRouche transformation? It’s possible that they were separate groups, but the original group was certainly international – it had members (possibly only one) in sleepy ol’ Adelaide.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s