7 thoughts on “Monday message board

  1. Growth in International student numbers has reduced drastically.

    Following are the possible reasons:

    – Most Australian companies don’t prefer International students. So it does not make sense for students to come to Australia and spend more money on tuition and living expenses(compared to their home country), and then not being able to work in Australia.

    – The Asian students are getting the sense that Australia prefers British/European migrants. Some of students don’t appreciate Australia’s discriminiatory immigrant policy, so they decide to go back to their home countries. They also convey this message to their friend, who then think twice before deciding to come to Australia.

    – In the past few years race attacks on International student’s have increased. Also in some instances Australian government have been inciting the Australian public against Asian and African immigrants. This doesn’t help.




    – Other European countries like France and Germany are increasingly looking for overseas student. Even Poland is aggressively looking for skilled migrants from Asia. So some of the International students/migrants have begun substituting Europe for Australia.


  2. I’ve posted on this before but I’ll say it again because I think it’s a sleeper: the next PM will increase coal production whatever the rhetoric on climate change. With exports India is begging for more cheap coal now and China will do the same within 3 years. I’d argue that iron ore exports are a complementary good even if they go to a different country than metallurgical coal, since they are part of a pool. Therefore a lot of the resources boom relies on keeping the party going in Asia i.e. we are co-dependent.

    Domestically Garrett’s pie-in-the-sky renewable energy schemes simply won’t be enough to replace coal. We will be given innumerable reasons why we can’t cut back just yet.

  3. I wonder whether any of the professional economists here would like to comment on a recent article in Business Week which suggests official US manufacturing production and productivity data are wrong. Apparently there is a problem with so-called “Phantom GDP” created by mistaken import price statistics. An extract:

    “…new evidence suggests that shifting production overseas has inflicted worse damage on the U.S. economy than the numbers show. BusinessWeek has learned of a gaping flaw in the way statistics treat offshoring…

    The underlying problem is located in an obscure statistic: the import price data published monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Because of it, many of the cost cuts and product innovations being made overseas by global companies and foreign suppliers aren’t being counted properly. And that spells trouble because, surprisingly, the government uses the erroneous import price data directly and indirectly as part of its calculation for many other major economic statistics, including productivity, the output of the manufacturing sector, and real gross domestic product (GDP)…

    By BusinessWeek’s admittedly rough estimate, offshoring may have created about $66 billion in phantom GDP gains since 2003 (page 31). That would lower real GDP today by about half of 1%, which is substantial but not huge. But put another way, $66 billion would wipe out as much as 40% of the gains in manufacturing output over the same period…â€?.

    Thanks to Angry Bear.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s