Epic Oz Meltdown

The periodic meltdowns at the Oz (see here and here) have been growing ever more bizarre. But it will be hard to top this episode, where editor-in-chief Chris Mitchell threatened to sue academic Julie Posetti for defamation. Posetti’s supposed defamation consisted of two Twitter posts summarising a speech by Asa Wahlquist, for many years the leading environmental reporter at the Oz. As Posetti summarised it Wahlquist found working for the Oz under Mitchell “excruciating” … “torture”, because of the paper’s anti-science stance

I’m a bit behind on this – as usual, Tim Lambert is the go-to guy, and there are more reports at Crikey, LP and the ABC.

What is most amusing here is the way in which a string of Oz journalists spontaneously line up to write articles saying that Chris Mitchell would never tell anyone what to write.

What is most significant, looking at the Murdoch press more generally, is Murdoch’s willingness to trash the credibility of his media assets, built up over a long period, in the pursuit of ideological agendas and (perhaps) short-term profits. The Oz was never a great paper, but it used to be a good one, even if it was pretty reliably conservative. More strikingly, the same process is going on at The Times (of London), once regarded as the world’s ultimate journal of record. The same is true of the Wall Street Journal – before Murdoch took over the general view was that even if the Op-Ed pages were barking mad, the news was always accurate. Now the distinction between news and opinion is disappearing fast.

And the same can be said for the political right as a whole. Their eagerness to see plain issues of fact (WMDs in Iraq, global warming, the existence of a DDT ban) as subjects for political debate hasn’t done them much harm in the short term. But as the “epistemic closure” fuss a while back shows, everyone is increasingly aware that truth and falsehood are no longer meaningful terms for those on the right. This will, I think, entail some big costs for them in the long run.

25 thoughts on “Epic Oz Meltdown

  1. Re: “But as the “epistemic closure” fuss a while back shows, everyone is increasingly aware that truth and falsehood are no longer meaningful terms for those on the right. This will, I think, entail some big costs for them in the long run.”

    That’s if we are permitted a long run by “those on the right”. No long run, no costs specific to them.

  2. Whilst I agree with the ‘big costs in the long run’ (or at least I hope that it is true and can construct a plausible story where it is true) I consider Labor inside ‘the Right’. Another plausible story, one that I would believe, could be made where Murdoch and his lickboots are a greater threat to civil society than religious fundamentalists.

  3. Fran, why are you giving Mark your phone number.
    Are you sure he’ll respect you afterwards?
    ewww’s!

  4. I left the Oz regular readership long ago, mainly because of the insufferable – almost la-Rouchian angle on climate change in particular – slant on so many news items and even feature articles. When not even the content has to be accurate or true – every damn thing is opinion or “sources close to…said…”, it is a bit of a stretch to trust. Love the irony of suing an academic for tweeting an ex-journo fairly accurately (cf newsprint hurdle of accuracy in reporting, anyway). It resonates.

  5. @Alice

    The file name of the post was “9225”. Presumably this was autogenerated, but it was hyperlinked with this string as the identifier at the RecentPosts table.

  6. JQ, a question.

    Would you be so critical of OZ if they paid you for regular columns? I am extremely suspicious as to why you never bag the Fin Review.

  7. @Fran Barlow
    ha ha Fran…yr post did look like you were handing out your phone no willy nilly to unknowns!! (eww as Paul said) but I know your were not!
    Anyway – Im not quite sure why the heading 9225 disappeared – but it did.

  8. MItchell has now suggested (via his lawyer) that Posetti apologise, go to mediation with Asa Wahlquist and spend several days with him seeing how The Australian works – in other he won’t sue if she subjects herself to several different sorts of ritual public humiliation. He obviously doesn’t understand that he really, really should just walk away from this before it gets even worse for him.

  9. Mitchell sounds like a nasty lying piece of work to me….lets not gve him the benefits of any doubts because it doesnt seem like the doubt anywhere is falling in his favour – just some bumptious aggro newspaper hack…

  10. A small question re: “epistemic closure”. I know what it means in this context, but the confusing thing for me is that the phrase is already used to describe the acceptance of knowledge under entailment. It seems to be an awful phrase to choose for these purposes:

    http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/closure-epistemic

    Can’t we call it something else?

  11. Ah, Agnes Day… mercurial vision with the limpid dark eyes, from schoolsdays of future past.
    Including the Bettancourt, why worry about the “structures” taking to the streets, when you can can the very base, itself, or so they think as they dehumanise themselves deeper.
    They don’t get who “dumbing down” dumbs down, meritricious stumblebums that they are.

  12. @Fran Barlow
    Praise be to Naomi – we normal folk are are drowning in agnotology these days
    Its got so bad there is a real feeling of persistent lingering dissonance…”ie can this really be happening? Do people actually believe this nonsense?”

    agnotology = “is the study of culturally-induced ignorance or doubt, particularly the publication of inaccurate or misleading scientific data”.

    Everyday phenomenon – get your “news” ( ranters regular opinions ? Proffeshor Schkepticks ideas ?..) here.

    Cant stop using Dons = its almost as good as agnotology.

  13. As soon as Government departments stop buying the Oz and they stop giving it away free and start charging for online copy will it have any circulation left?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s