Another Monday Message Board. Post comments on any topic. As usual, civilised discussion and no coarse language. Lengthy side discussions to the sandpits, please.
-
Follow
Following
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
John Quiggin 
@Jim Rose
I do not know the question to which you provide an answer. I assume you have a conversation with yourself and you erroneously addressed your reply to me.
@Ernestine Gross you said that “Empiricism is the name given to a segment of the literature on the theory of knowledge.”
Empiricism is a theory of knowledge. one of many.
@Jim Rose I was wondering if you could demonstrate what you know about economics?
The emphasis should be on what you “know” not what you think someone else “knows”.
I don’t know too much about economics but I can recognise an argument properly constructed. You have not presented any such argument. Ever.
@rog was my argument about how market socialism is based on neoclassical economics and market socialism provoked a fruitful debate on whether socialism was feasible and superior to capitalism not properly constructed?
My argument was a counter-example to the proposition that
the socialist calculation debate led to a much deeper understand of social systems, the operation of the market as a process, the role of knowledge as the basic economic problem, the role of property rights, and the role of the entrepreneur.
@Jim Rose …or was it not?
@Jim Rose
I am happy to read @2, p3 you finally understood my answer to your question on p2.
@Ernestine Gross empiricism is a flash harry name for the data speaks for itself. the foundation of data mining.