After neoliberalism: a snippet

Over the fold, some concluding comments from a chapter I’ve written about the rise and decline of neoliberalism. I’m drawing on the “three-party system” analysis I’ve put forward before, in which neoliberalism (in both ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ forms) is increasingly breaking down under pressure from tribalists on the right, and from an amorphous, but still resurgent left.

This is just a snippet, which I hope will evolve into a more extensive discussion of the policies and political strategies the left should adopt in response to the breakdown of the neoliberal order.

The failure of neoliberalism poses both challenges and opportunities for the left. The greatest challenge is the need to confront rightwing tribalism as a powerful political force in itself, rather than as a source of political support for hard neoliberalism. Given the dangers posed by tribalism this is an urgent task. One part of this task is that of articulating an explanation of the failure of neoliberalism and explaining why the simplistic policy responses of tribalist politicians will do nothing to resolve the problems. The other is to appeal to the positive elements of the appeal of tribalism, such as solidarity and affection for long-standing institutions and to counterpose them to the self-seeking individualism central to neoliberalism, particularly in the hard version with which political tribalism has long been aligned.

The great opportunity is to present a progressive alternative to the accommodations of soft neoliberalism. The core of such an alternative must be a revival of the egalitarian and activist politics of the postwar social democratic moment, updated to take account of the radically different technological and social structures of the 21st century. In technological terms, the most important development is undoubtedly the rise of the Internet. Thinking about the relationship between the Internet economy and public policy remains embryonic at best. But as a massive public good created, in very large measure, by the public sector, the Internet ought to present opportunities for a radically remodeled progressive policy agenda.

In political terms, the breakdown of neoliberalism implies the need for a political realignment. This is now taking place on the right, as tribalists assert their dominance over hard neoliberals. The most promising strategy for the left is to achieve a similar shift in power within the centre-left coalition of leftists and soft neoliberals.

This might seem a hopeless task, but there are positive signs, notably in the United States. Although Hillary Clinton, an archetypal soft neoliberal, has won the Democratic nomination for the Presidency and seems likely to win, her policy proposals have been driven, in large measure by the need to compete with the progressive left. There is reason to hope that, whereas the first Clinton presidency symbolised the capture of the Democratic Party by soft neoliberalism, the second will symbolise the resurgence of social liberalism.

The era of unchallenged neoliberal dominance is clearly over. Hopefully, it will prove to have been a relatively brief interruption in a long term trend towards a more humane and egalitarian society. Whether that is true depends on the success of the left in putting forward a positive alternative.

34 thoughts on “After neoliberalism: a snippet

  1. Jordan from Croatia makes some very valid points! Today I read an article by Michael Spence
    Entitled “We are facing two secular stagnations, not just one.” It was very thought provoking
    And may interest Jordan from Croatia because Michael Spence is a Nobel laureate in economics. This Project syndicate Article could have a few answers.

  2. @Ikonoclast

    The facts are in on this. I could name any number of reputable economists who have demonstrated the case in various ways (empirical data and theory explicating the data) but mentioning Piketty and Stiglitz should do.

    LOL

  3. @Tom N.

    “LOL”

    Now that’s a snappy comment. I am in awe of your ability to express your response in a way that resonates with intelligent people.

  4. I’m straining my puny brain, I really am.

    but.

    “productivity” seems to be the word of the moment.

    then we have a situation like live export of animals going gangbusters

    and there being only one (yes one) tannery left in OZ.

    how does that equate to productivity?

    as for a more humane and egalitarian society, it is and as far as I can see, always been the productive ones doing what they can in the face of implacable avarice to hold on to the results of their productivity.

    slow, against the odds and prone to despair.

    but.

    if there are more than one tannery and im’ wrong, that would be great.

  5. While quality is essential, you may often get yourself a
    dvd watches at huge discounts. Of course, what many people enjoy most are greater entertaining
    popular features of most cellphones.

    Are you sick and tired with losing your network whenever you go outside or
    even in certain corners within your house.

    Once from the system menu on the device (as presented
    to you from the manual), you need to look throughout the menus to configure the product properly.
    Top rated wireless extenders So when I heard around the new
    Linksys Wireless-N Range Extender I was more anxious about it than I happen to be about any device for
    any while (well, barring the i – Pad 2 perhaps).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s