Surprise resignation paradox

Tony Blair’s announcement that he will resign within a year, but that he won’t say when, is one of those absurdities that seem to be inevitable in politics, a variant on the Galbraith score. There doesn’t seem to be any satisfactory way of handling this kind of situation, since most leaders want to be seen to be making their own choice to leave, but few are willing make that choice until most of their followers already want them to go.

8 thoughts on “Surprise resignation paradox

  1. the best example of resignation tactics I’ve come across in recent years was the resignation of Jean Chretien in Canada. He was facing enormous pressure within his party,and was about to be forced out of office via a vote at an upcoming party conference by his Finance Minister Paul Martin. So he resigned. However, he exploited a loophole in the party rules – he forward dated his resignation for almost a year later. (ie “here’s my resignation, with effect from…) He could not be ousted, because he’d already resigned, but he was still hanging around! Neat eh?

    Paul Martin eventually got the job, only to lose it in this year’s election.

    I’m not sure of the exact procedural details, I suspect it was one of those situations where only a simple majority was required to vote him out, but a super-majority of some sort was needed to overturn the loophole that he’d found: if there’s any Canadian watchers of this blog they might know.

  2. if you regard politicians as a welfare group it is obvious we are just seeing how difficult it is to get people off welfare payments.

    Perhaps we could recommend a system of obligations that failure to perform would lead to breaching.

  3. I think if I was a defaulting welfare recipient I would favour an election process over the current process for breaching.

    Get together a group who rely on your patron or are your friends for the month to vote whether you are in most cases 99% sure of receiving largesse rather than being breached.

  4. It is an odd site, watching the most successful Labour politician in British history, 18 months or so after winning a third term, be hounded from office by his own party.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s