Weekend reflections

Weekend Reflections is on again. Please comment on any topic of interest (civilised discussion and no coarse language, please). Feel free to put in contributions more lengthy than for the Monday Message Board or standard comments. (Polite) meta-comments on the tipping competition in the previous post are also invited.

51 thoughts on “Weekend reflections

  1. The identification of equilibrium with teleology seems very unhelpful to me. Setting that aside, the critique of neoclassical economics in terms of open systems and uncertainty is the sort of thing post-Keynesians and critical realists go on about. (Shackle is an important influence on both of those schools.) The challenge to deterministic modelling is hardly the preserve of Austrians, and, as I pointed out when you attacked PAE, you should be grateful to have so many allies in this endeavour.

    In any case, I suspect that what John is after is not evidence that Austrians can match with it with post-Keynesians when it come to ontological speculation, but rather an instance of Austrians identifying some puzzle in economic life, and offering an original and convincing explanation for it. After 1980, he said, so the socialist calculation debate doesn’t count.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s